contact

Copied

contact

contact

Copied

contact

contact

Copied

contact

01

Context

Where do university students find the most friction in completing common processes?

Tasked with addressing a problem faced by university students, we looked towards our friends' common complaints. With continuous co-op cycles in Waterloo, finding and subletting housing every other term is a complicated and tiresome process that many students experience for the first time in their lives.

02

User Research

Conducting user interviews

We interviewed 12 university students spanning different years and programs. Compiling our findings in a final affinity diagram, we identified three main pain points.

Uncertainty

The individual housing search process leaves students in the dark when they look for the first time.

Credibility

Difficult to determine trustworthy places and landlords from scams.

Time Constraints

Quick turnaround time between co-op terms and study terms in addition to other commitments.

User personas

The Newcomer

WANG, 1ST YEAR UNI STUDENT

GOAL

Gain an understanding of the local housing system to secure student housing as an international student.

NEEDS

Guidance during a complex and stressful search process.

PAIN POINTS

No reassurance or structure when navigating his search for student housing.

The Nomad

NADINE, 3RD YEAR UNI STUDENT

GOAL

Find a sublet while finishing her co-op term.

NEEDS

Determine a trustworthy platform and subletter on her own.

PAIN POINTS

She has to look through multiple listing platforms and compile comparisons externally.

03

Reworked Problem Statement

How might we centralize and streamline the rental and subletting process for post-secondary students?

04

User Journeys

Two possible user journeys

Based on our two personas' goals and pain points.

THE NEWCOMER

Centering around a personalized timeline feature

Guide international students or students unfamiliar with the housing process.

THE NOMAD

Taking a rating-based system approach

Determine credibility and increase efficient communication.

05

Low-Fi

Wireframes

As a group, we discussed specific features and details of our app to create low-fi wireframes. My wireframes reflected my own ideas and early considerations of my team.

Onboarding

Home Page

Search + Messages

Timeline + Saved

06

Visual Identity

A friendly mascot that guides users as they search.

It was important to choose inviting and approachable colours for our visual identity. These were especially prevalent in our onboarding screens that serve as a user's first impression of our experience.

First Draft

Final

07

User Testing

Identifying gaps in user flow: the Timeline

After working towards a working prototype and conducting usability tests from university students, we identified issues concerning clarity in our main feature.

Usability Issues

— Subtask vs. individual task perception

— Tight padding, less digestible

— Missing task completion feedback

— Different task order interpretation

Our Improvements

+ Reposition current task placement

+ Improved padding and legibility

+ Differentiate completion through colour

+ Numbered tasks

+ Emphasized current task as a CTA

Before

After

08

Final Solution

Onboarding

Learning users' goals, deadlines, and preferences.

Student Verification

For students, by students.

Home Page

Accessible, suggested places and overview.

Listing Overview

Student-relevant, noting distances to nearby schools and varying lease lengths.

Messages

Split into rentals and sublets, communicate with landlords in one place.

Conversation Topics

Receive common lease questions to cover all your bases.

09

Takeaways & Next Steps

With three months to complete a fully prototyped app, I appreciated the time we could spend doing user research in comparison to the speed of one or two-day design competitions. Specifically, having the opportunity to complete user testing and iterate upon feedback was a welcome change from ideating, building, and presenting all within eight hours.

Unsurprisingly, user testing is critical to a polished and thoughtful product.

Owning the Timeline feature, I learned the most from considering user feedback and making the necessary changes to improve its navigation. The remaining features of our app were more conventional and therefore had a foundation to build off of.

If time permitted, I would consider:

Landlord View

Due to time constraints, we could only design student-facing materials. Develop additional landlord functions and features.

Subletting

Designing to accommodate sublet-specific pain points, such as compatibility and a rating system.

Contract Integration

We understand that all leasing organizations have their own online portals and methods. Allowing accessible views to these documents would be convenient.

visit again soon!

Easing the transition into the student housing market.

→ Students gain reassurance and structure throughout a complex and stressful process

ROLES

UX Researcher

Product Designer

Brand Designer

TIMELINE

3 months

Sept. 2025 → Nov. 2025

TEAM MEMBERS

Ibrahim Ma

Gabriel Schnobb

Hanh Minh Tran

TOOLS

Figma Design, Slides

Miro

see final prototype →

see final screens →

01

Context

Where do university students find the most friction in completing common processes?

Tasked with addressing a problem faced by university students, we looked towards our friends' common complaints. With continuous co-op cycles in Waterloo, finding and subletting housing every other term is a complicated and tiresome process that many students experience for the first time in their lives.

02

User Research

12 User Interviews

Each member interviewed 3 university students spanning different years and programs. Compiling our findings in a final affinity diagram, we identified three main pain points.

Uncertainty

The individual housing search process leaves students in the dark when they look for the first time.

Credibility

Difficult to determine trustworthy places and landlords from scams.

Time Constraints

Quick turnaround time between co-op terms and study terms in addition to other commitments.

User Personas

The Newcomer

WANG, 1ST YEAR UNI STUDENT

GOAL

Gain an understanding of the local housing system to secure student housing as an international student.

NEEDS

Guidance during a complex and stressful search process.

PAIN POINTS

No reassurance or structure when navigating his search for student housing.

The Nomad

NADINE, 3RD YEAR UNI STUDENT

GOAL

Find a sublet while finishing her co-op term.

NEEDS

Determine a trustworthy platform and subletter on her own.

PAIN POINTS

She has to look through multiple listing platforms and compile comparisons externally.

03

Reworked Problem Statement

How might we centralize and streamline the rental and subletting process for post-secondary students?

04

User Journeys

Two possible user journeys

Based on our two personas' goals and pain points.

THE NEWCOMER

Centering around a personalized timeline feature

Guide international students or students unfamiliar with the housing process.

THE NOMAD

Taking a rating-based system approach

Determine credibility and increase efficient communication.

05

Low-Fi

Wireframes

As a group, we discussed specific features and details of our app to create low-fi wireframes. My wireframes reflected my own ideas and early considerations of my team.

Onboarding

Home Page

Search + Messages

Timeline + Saved

06

Visual Identity

A friendly mascot that guides users as they search.

It was important to choose inviting and approachable colours for our visual identity. These were especially prevalent in our onboarding screens that serve as a user's first impression of our experience.

First Draft

Final

07

User Testing

Identifying gaps in user flow: the Timeline

After working towards a working prototype and conducting usability tests from university students, we identified issues concerning clarity in our main feature.

Usability Issues

— Subtask vs. individual task perception

— Tight padding, less digestible

— Missing task completion feedback

— Different task order interpretation

Our Improvements

+ Reposition current task placement

+ Improved padding and legibility

+ Differentiate completion through colour

+ Numbered tasks

+ Emphasized current task as a CTA

Before

After

08

Final Solution

Onboarding

Learning users' goals, deadlines, and preferences.

Student Verification

For students, by students.

Home Page

Accessible, suggested places and overview.

Listing Overview

Student-relevant, noting distances to nearby schools and varying lease lengths.

Messages

Split into rentals and sublets, communicate with landlords in one place.

Conversation Topics

Receive common lease questions to cover all your bases.

07

Takeaways & Next Steps

With three months to complete a fully prototyped app, I appreciated the time we could spend doing user research in comparison to the speed of one or two-day design competitions. Specifically, having the opportunity to complete user testing and iterate upon feedback was a welcome change from ideating, building, and presenting all within eight hours.

Unsurprisingly, user testing is critical to a polished and thoughtful product.

Owning the Timeline feature, I learned the most from considering user feedback and making the necessary changes to improve its navigation. The remaining features of our app were more conventional and therefore had a foundation to build off of.

If time permitted, I would consider:

Landlord View

Due to time constraints, we could only design student-facing materials. Develop additional landlord functions and features.

Subletting

Designing to accommodate sublet-specific pain points, such as compatibility and a rating system.

Contract Integration

We understand that all leasing organizations have their own online portals and methods. Allowing accessible views to these documents would be convenient.